change

Cognitive strength and conditioning.

by Steve Wyckoff on November 8, 2010

I recently had a conversation with the teacher who read my blog post on high school math. I was told that I’d missed the most important aspect regarding students learning math in high school. The most important aspect, I was told, is that students need to learn algebra and other higher math because it trains them, and their minds, in a certain way of thinking and performing.

I’ve heard this argument many times, and in fact read an article some time ago that compared it to athletes lifting weights. The article argued that very few athletes participate in competitive weightlifting, yet they all lift weights to prepare for their particular competition.

That made some sense to me but I don’t think they took the analogy far enough. I believe that cognitive strength and conditioning is necessary for our students. I just don’t believe that the courses we have traditionally taught in schools are the only way to achieve cognitive strength and conditioning.

I think that that defense is a rationalization to support continuing what we’ve always done. I would agree that algebra and other higher math courses are appropriate for some kids, but as in athletics, the method of strength and conditioning used by an individual depends on their ultimate goal.

Not all athletes lift weights and condition in the same way. In fact, athletes in the same sport approach strength and conditioning differently. I think we should have that same flexibility in our schools.

Every time I talk to teachers and other educators about school change they agree that schools need to change. However, whenever we start to get to the details we can never reach agreement what should be changed. No matter what area of the current educational system I bring up there’s a rationale for keeping it as it is.

The cognitive strength and conditioning argument is just another rationalization to avoid real school change. – Steve Wyckoff

{ 2 comments }

School change: Are we doing anything right?

by Steve Wyckoff on September 14, 2010

I speak to groups often about school change and I frequently hear the same question, “Don’t you think were doing anything right?” The answer is “yes” with a great big BUT. That “BUT” is this.

We are doing the best job in education that we have ever done, at what we’ve always done. The problem is this, what we’ve always done is not the right thing to be doing in the 21st century.

The problem is school change happens so slowly, or not at all, that over the years, and now even decades, we have fallen further and further behind. Most of you are too young to remember this chronology but in the 60s we saw major shift when we included special education students in regular education classrooms.

Between that time and 1983 we saw a very gradual gap develop between what we were doing in schools and what we needed to be doing with our students to prepare them for their future. In 1983 the report, A Nation At Risk, was the first shot across the bow of public education.

Between 1983 and the late 1980s we saw an increase in the criticism of public education that led to a highly contentious conversation about “outcome based education.” That was a really the beginning of the conversation fueled by our students’ inability to adequately perform in society.

Between the late 80s and the early 1990s we saw states all across the country mandating accreditation processes based on outcomes rather than inputs. Kansas was no different. The Outcome Accreditation Task force was charged with creating the structure for a new accreditation process that would become known as QPA, Quality Performance Accreditation. In the interest of full disclosure I was part of that task force.

Following the implementation of accreditation processes focusing on outcomes across the nation, there was a mass movement to understand and identify standards, align curriculum, and base accountability on state level standardized assessments. The crowning jewel of that movement is No Child Left Behind.

And now in Kansas we have the Kansas Education Commission trying to figure out what the next iteration of  NCLB will look like. Again, in the interest of full disclosure I am part of the Kansas Education Commission.

I can tell you what it shouldn’t look like. It shouldn’t look like schools have looked for over 100 years. The problem is this. We have spent the last 25 years seriously trying to improve public education by getting better at what we’ve always done. Somewhere along the line we should have started the conversation about what we should be doing instead of what we’ve always done.

So when somebody asks, “Are we doing anything right?” It depends on your perspective. If you’re asking, “Are we getting the things right that we’re working on?” The answer is “yes” we’re doing a tremendous job. If you’re asking, “Are all the things were working on the right things to be working on in order to prepare our kids for the 21st century?” the answer is “absolutely not.”

It’s not too late, but we need to get moving. School change doesn’t just mean that we change how we do what we’ve always done, it means to change what we’re doing.-  Steve Wyckoff

{ 0 comments }

School change over under: How many schools will adopt Project Based Learning?

March 29, 2010

Friday I had the distinct pleasure of listening to a panel discussion by educators from Erie Kansas about real school change. Mike Carson, Ted Hill, Rose Frye, and Steve Oliver engaged in a wonderful webcast that lasted over an hour and a half, talking about project-based learning. The most encouraging thing about the webcast was [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

School change: who is it toughest on?

March 15, 2010

Most people really don’t like change, even though there are those among us who love it. In schools the dislike for change is profound. I think that educators are so resistant to change because we simply rarely change. Anything. Ever. Oh, we see the individual teacher who changes instructional techniques, but if you took somebody [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Preparing kids for THEIR future

March 12, 2010

I have just begun to read Howard Gardner’s new book Five Minds For The Future. And to my great surprise, I’m being facetious here, in the very first chapter he talks about the inadequacies of our educational system in preparing our kids for their future. I’m actually not here to talk about his book today, [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

“Until the whole ugly, sloppy, inefficient, demoralizing, dehumanizing, mess makes everybody unhappy.”

February 24, 2010

Earlier this week I attended a State conference for Career and Technical Education. I’m trying to learn all I can about the do’s and don’ts, and the rules and regulations. Now I may not be the brightest guy in the world, but I find the maze of regulations to be, well, amazing. Furthermore, what you [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Is public education in a death spiral?

February 8, 2010

Yes. I fear it is. It’s slow, almost imperceptible, but things are either standing dead still, which is the same as getting worse, or getting worse. But for me the most depressing part is we aren’t even dealing with the  most important educational issues. The only discussion going on among mainstream educators is about money, [...]

0 comments Read the full article →